31 October 2010
"I do believe in spooks"
The headline of this entry is of course the affirmation of the Cowardly Lion, as Dorothy and her three allegorical companions walk through the scary forest surrounding the witch's castle. An affirmation appropriate to today's holiday, surely.
The 19th century German logician, Christoph von Sigwart (1830 - 1894), didn't believe in the Lion's affirmation. Well ... presumably he had never walked through that particular forest. Still, let us record that he wrote: "No amount of failure in the attempt to subject the world of sensible experience to a thorough-going system of conceptions, and to bring all happenings back to cases of immutably valid law, is able to shake our faith in the rightness of our principles. We hold fast to our demand that even the greatest apparent confusion must sooner or later solve itself in transparent formulas."
The "we" in the second of those sentences is the western post-Renaissance scientific spirit, inclined to put facts into tables and draw conclusions, then impute those conclusions to God or (what is the same) the nature of things.
As Dostoyevsky knew, as his "underground man" expressed with eloquence at about the time that Sigwart was writing those words, there is also that within "us" that rebels against the "transparent formulas" in which "we" have such faith. So let the thorough-going system of conceptions have the other 364 days of the year. This one is given over to defiance, to sensible experiences that aren't so sensible, and aren't interested in "solving themselves." To flights on broomsticks and knocks on the door though nobody is there.
To the unenlightened belief in spooks. Cheers!
The 19th century German logician, Christoph von Sigwart (1830 - 1894), didn't believe in the Lion's affirmation. Well ... presumably he had never walked through that particular forest. Still, let us record that he wrote: "No amount of failure in the attempt to subject the world of sensible experience to a thorough-going system of conceptions, and to bring all happenings back to cases of immutably valid law, is able to shake our faith in the rightness of our principles. We hold fast to our demand that even the greatest apparent confusion must sooner or later solve itself in transparent formulas."
The "we" in the second of those sentences is the western post-Renaissance scientific spirit, inclined to put facts into tables and draw conclusions, then impute those conclusions to God or (what is the same) the nature of things.
As Dostoyevsky knew, as his "underground man" expressed with eloquence at about the time that Sigwart was writing those words, there is also that within "us" that rebels against the "transparent formulas" in which "we" have such faith. So let the thorough-going system of conceptions have the other 364 days of the year. This one is given over to defiance, to sensible experiences that aren't so sensible, and aren't interested in "solving themselves." To flights on broomsticks and knocks on the door though nobody is there.
To the unenlightened belief in spooks. Cheers!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Knowledge is warranted belief -- it is the body of belief that we build up because, while living in this world, we've developed good reasons for believing it. What we know, then, is what works -- and it is, necessarily, what has worked for us, each of us individually, as a first approximation. For my other blog, on the struggles for control in the corporate suites, see www.proxypartisans.blogspot.com.
7 comments:
The headline brought to mind Philip Roth's novel, The Human Stain, in which a college professor notices that two of the students who signed up for his seminar have never shown up, and he asks, "Do they exist or are they spooks?" The professor is accused of racism, even though he did not know that the two students were African-American. So be careful using that word, especially if you are going to endorse irrationality on one day a year.
buy a knockoff coach purse coach knock off purses with low price
This is very interesting, You're a very skilled blogger. I've joined your rss feed
and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post.
Also, I've shared your site in my social networks!
my web blog golden retriever lab mix puppy
I believe everything posted was very logical. However, think about this, what if you
typed a catchier post title? I ain't saying your information is not good., however what if you added a title that makes people desire more? I mean ""I do believe in spooks"" is kinda boring. You ought to look at Yahoo's
home page and note how they create article headlines to grab viewers interested.
You might add a video or a related picture or two to grab readers interested about what you've got to say. In my opinion, it might make your posts a little livelier.
Here is my blog check my reference
Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an incredibly long comment but after I clicked
submit my comment didn't show up. Grrrr... well I'm not writing all that
over again. Regardless, just wanted to say wonderful blog!
Check out my website more helpful hints
Hi every one, here every person is sharing these kinds of familiarity, therefore it's pleasant to read this website, and I used to go to see this blog daily.
my website ... golden labrador retriever puppies
Good day! Do you use Twitter? I'd like to follow you if that would be okay. I'm absolutely enjoying your blog and look forward to new updates.
Here is my site Helpful Resources
Post a Comment