I've been catching up with the television series Mad Men.
Regular readers of this blog are of course aware that I’m a
fan. Not-so-regular readers can become aware in detail easily enough: here.
The first episode of the new series (formally known as
episodes 1 + 2, I gather, though it was seamless dramatically) drew a lot of
attention for Megan Draper’s (actress Jessica Paré’s) rendition of Zou Bisou
Bisou (“shoo kiss kiss” according to a quick cheap net translation). Here’s a link courtesy of YouTube. And certainly that’s attention getting.
But an
equally fascinating subplot involved the fantasy life of Lane Pryce. To review:
Lane Pryce is the fellow sent to America by the Brits, Puttnam Powell and Lowe,
when PP&L briefly owned the ‘old’ Sterling Cooper, to ride herd over these
unreliable Americans. He took part in the shenanigans that helped create a newly
independent ad agency, and for his help became a partner in what has since been
Sterling Cooper Draper and Pryce.
We’ve known, or at least been given
opportunity to sense, for some time already that Pryce has an inhibited and
potentially troublesome sexuality. This episode seemed to bring that to a new
level.
Pryce finds an abandoned wallet in a taxicab,
and becomes infatuated with a woman in a photograph there. There’s also a lot
of money in the wallet – Lane, a man of honor in all matters financial, returns
the wallet with all the cash intact to its proper owner: a Mr. Polito. It’s a lot
of cash, and Polito may be some sort of mobbed-up big shot. Pryce has, though, pocketed the photo of the
gal that both he and Polito now in a manner share: Delores.
In a brief telephone conversation, Dolores
seems open at least to some flirtation with Pryce.
I’m not really taking any huge leap here when
I say I smell trouble.
Episode 3 is Betty-centric, and gives us a
chance to catch up with Betty and her new husband, Henry Francis. Betty is
wonderfully portrayed by January Jones, as a woman facing weight gain and, as
the show develops, fears that something much worse is behind it.
The writers use Henry Francis to comment on contemporary
(2012) politics. After all, it is now
certain (as certain as such things can be) that the Republicans will this
summer nominate Mitt Romney for the office of President of the United States.
Mitt is the son of George Romney, who was a rather big wheel in the Mad Men
era.
In the summer of 1966, when George Romney was Governor of
Michigan, and the former CEO of American Motors. He was widely considered
serious presidential timber (a status he would eventually – in 1967 -- forfeit
with an ill considered remark about how he had been “brainwashed.”) Romney was
also seen as the heir to Nelson Rockefeller as the moderate/liberal Republican
most prominent in the presidential sweepstakes. After a loss to Barry Goldwater
in the 1964 Republican convention, Rocky seems to have lost interest in presidential
contention and in effect he was thereafter a supporter of Romney’s own jockeying
in 1966.
So much for reality: what about the fictive
world? Henry Francis was an aide to Nelson Rockefeller when his relationship
with Betty Draper began. He has left Rocky’s employ, and is now working for the
Mayor of New York City, John Lindsay. So Francis is making a career for himself
on the leftward end of the viable intra-party spectrum within the GOP. Francis
is exactly the sort of person most likely to have been an enthusiast of George
Romney at this time.
It is startling, then, to see Francis briefly
on the phone, apparently with somebody who works for Gov. Romney. Francis is
refusing an offer of a joint Lindsay/Romney photo op because, he says, “Romney
is a clown.”
I have no reason to argue with the opinion
that Mitt Romney is a clown. But
George Romney was not especially clownish, certainly not from the perspective
of a Henry Francis. Nor was he clownish from the perspective of electoral success
– that November he would win re-election by an impressive margin. I think it
odd and unfortunate that the writers of Mad Men would let 2012 exert a sort of
backward causation into their plot in this way.
Still … the show makes us think. And I enjoyed
both (all three!) of these episodes.
No comments:
Post a Comment