Showing posts with label Lyndon Johnson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lyndon Johnson. Show all posts
28 April 2012
The Years of Lyndon Johnson: Part 4
I’m looking at a copy of Robert Caro’s latest, THE PASSAGE
OF POWER. This is the fourth book in his series THE YEARS OF LYNDON JOHNSON.
One of the themes in the early going of Vol. 4 could be
summarized in the words “Johnson dithered.” It is Caro’s view that he might
well have won the Democratic nomination for President in 1960 if he had grabbed
for it himself with his usual decisiveness and energy. But that would have
meant laying groundwork as early as 1958, and engaging in a serious hunt for
delegates through 1959. Johnson did neither of those things. Nor did he close the door on them.
He dithered.
By January 1960, he finally seemed ready to get busy. His strategy required
the Mountain West. He assumed he could go into the convention as the south’s
candidate, but to be something more, his natural allies were to be found in the
mountain states – on mining and other resource issues, he had a Senate record
that found admirers there.
So Caro gives us the following scene from early 1960. An
experienced western-states political operative, Irving Hoff, was now working
there on LBJ's behalf, and Hoff spoke for example with a key figure in Idaho who
had the wonderfully appropriate name Tom Boise.
These are Caro’s words:
In Idaho, where the
Hells Canyon Dam was rising day by day, and where political leaders knew who
had gotten them the dam at last, the Democratic state chairman, Tom Boise, had
told Hoff that, despite all the Kennedy efforts, many party leaders were still
considering supporting Johnson. ‘These guys were for Johnson,’ Hoff says, ‘If
we had been able to tell them that he was going to run, we’d have had that delegation.’
He explained this to Johnson, and Johnson accepted an invitation to speak in
Lewiston, Idaho, and afterwards to have a drink with Boise and his leaders in a
hotel suite. But in the suite [Johnson still couldn’t quite bring himself to
declare.] He said, ‘What the heck do you think I’m out here for – catching butterflies?
Do you see me carrying a net?’ But there were future government positions at
stake, careers at stake, issues at stake
– with the convention so close, rhetorical humor wasn’t enough. They pressed
him further. But all Johnson would say was, ‘I’ll let you know…You’ll be the
first to know.’”
(p. 74.)
Labels:
biography,
Idaho,
John Kennedy,
Lyndon Johnson,
mining,
Robert Caro
03 April 2011
Betting on Foreign Exchange
In the previous chapter (see full table of contents), we listed "metals" as one type of commodity. Yet the precious metals have a special historical significance -- for most of the history of civilization they weren't something bought with money. They were money.
That situation, their commodification: change came slowly, in many steps. In this chapter, I'd like to trace those steps, because they are critical to understanding the crisis that is our central topic. We have come back again and again to the idea of "hard money" versus "soft." How did money get so chronically soft? For simplicity's sake, this will be a US-centric account of what is in fact a multinational story.
1. Bimetallism and the Wizard(s) of oz
2. No-Metallism
3. Gold Returns: Bretton Woods system, 1944-1971.
4. US Hegemony Wanes
5. Johnson to Nixon. The end of the gold window.
6. A “Tobin tax” and other dubious notions arise.
7. Back to Chicago: Leo Melamed, and how the Merc outflanked the CBOT
8. Everything floats against everything. What could go wrong?
9. British pound in 1992, East Asian currencies later in the decade.
10. Staggering proliferation and complexity of financial derivatives.
11. Does the FX market constrain central banks? How well or poorly?
12. Another angle on the CME/CBOT merger
That situation, their commodification: change came slowly, in many steps. In this chapter, I'd like to trace those steps, because they are critical to understanding the crisis that is our central topic. We have come back again and again to the idea of "hard money" versus "soft." How did money get so chronically soft? For simplicity's sake, this will be a US-centric account of what is in fact a multinational story.
1. Bimetallism and the Wizard(s) of oz
2. No-Metallism
3. Gold Returns: Bretton Woods system, 1944-1971.
4. US Hegemony Wanes
5. Johnson to Nixon. The end of the gold window.
6. A “Tobin tax” and other dubious notions arise.
7. Back to Chicago: Leo Melamed, and how the Merc outflanked the CBOT
8. Everything floats against everything. What could go wrong?
9. British pound in 1992, East Asian currencies later in the decade.
10. Staggering proliferation and complexity of financial derivatives.
11. Does the FX market constrain central banks? How well or poorly?
12. Another angle on the CME/CBOT merger
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Knowledge is warranted belief -- it is the body of belief that we build up because, while living in this world, we've developed good reasons for believing it. What we know, then, is what works -- and it is, necessarily, what has worked for us, each of us individually, as a first approximation. For my other blog, on the struggles for control in the corporate suites, see www.proxypartisans.blogspot.com.

