I haven't been following the legal proceedings with regard to the once-renowned record producer Phil Spector and the death of Lana Clarkson.
I did follow the trial last year, and the more retentive of you may recall that I wrote some posts on it here. The upshot was that the jurors couldn't reach a verdict, and the judge dismissed them last September.
Here's a link to what the BBC had to say about it at the time.
The latest, though, is that after a lot of manuveuring it appears the re-trial will commence in October.
The re-trial is never as much trashy fun as the original.
Knowledge is warranted belief -- it is the body of belief that we build up because, while living in this world, we've developed good reasons for believing it. What we know, then, is what works -- and it is, necessarily, what has worked for us, each of us individually, as a first approximation. For my other blog, on the struggles for control in the corporate suites, see www.proxypartisans.blogspot.com.
Knowledge is warranted belief -- it is the body of belief that we build up because, while living in this world, we've developed good reasons for believing it. What we know, then, is what works -- and it is, necessarily, what has worked for us, each of us individually, as a first approximation. For my other blog, on the struggles for control in the corporate suites, see www.proxypartisans.blogspot.com.
Pages
▼
Hello Christoper,
ReplyDeleteI attended about 90% of the first trial and will be attending the second. I agree that Spector 2 will not be as interesting as Spector 1. Besides, the real "celebrity," Dominick Dunne won't be in the courtroom for round 2.
Looking forward to your take on the proceedings.