Showing posts with label home ownership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label home ownership. Show all posts
14 July 2011
Changes
I continue to work on what will be the short version of "Gambling With Borrowed Chips," my discussion of the role of leverage, speculation, and regulation in a modern economy. I'm making great progress.
Perhaps it is a sign of my progress that I have now abandoned the original outlines I wrote of the final chapters . Indeed, as the book has moved along the difference between the actual content of each chapter and the original plan/outline has expanded.
At one time, I had contemplated that chapters 13 to 17 would have the following titles:
13. Bankruptcies and Rescues
14. Public and Private Pensions
15. Home Ownership
16. Energy
17. Conclusions.
According to the latest plan, whatever actually will be their titles, their content will be respectively thus:
13. Early Responses to The Crisis
(Especially focusing on the first year of the Obama administration and things that didn't work.)
14. Labor Unions and Pensions
(Working analytically, from the basic justifications for labor unions to their newer roles and the demographics.)
15. The Ideology of Home Equity
(I'd like to present this in the form of a fable.)
16. Health Care
(The key to the second year of the Obama administration, and its business-cycle significance, along with some philosophizing about biology.)
17. Final Thoughts
(Final thoughts.)
Yes, that might not seem to hang together when put thus, but I've learned that the teller should not fight the tale.
Perhaps it is a sign of my progress that I have now abandoned the original outlines I wrote of the final chapters . Indeed, as the book has moved along the difference between the actual content of each chapter and the original plan/outline has expanded.
At one time, I had contemplated that chapters 13 to 17 would have the following titles:
13. Bankruptcies and Rescues
14. Public and Private Pensions
15. Home Ownership
16. Energy
17. Conclusions.
According to the latest plan, whatever actually will be their titles, their content will be respectively thus:
13. Early Responses to The Crisis
(Especially focusing on the first year of the Obama administration and things that didn't work.)
14. Labor Unions and Pensions
(Working analytically, from the basic justifications for labor unions to their newer roles and the demographics.)
15. The Ideology of Home Equity
(I'd like to present this in the form of a fable.)
16. Health Care
(The key to the second year of the Obama administration, and its business-cycle significance, along with some philosophizing about biology.)
17. Final Thoughts
(Final thoughts.)
Yes, that might not seem to hang together when put thus, but I've learned that the teller should not fight the tale.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
business cycle,
health care,
home ownership,
labor unions,
pensions
26 October 2007
Good to be home
As regular readers of this blog likely remember, I check out the local newspapers when I travel, not for the usual AP/Reuters stuff that I'd read anywhere else in the world, of course, but for the local stories.
As might be expected, in San Francisco over the last few days the BIG story has been the devastation in the southern part of their state, with some obvious local angles -- the bay area fire departments are sending assistance to their brethren, etc.
Less, predictably, a front page story in the San Francisco Chronicle Saturday said that there may be a serial killer preying on the homeless who camp out in Gold Gate Park. There have been three recent homicides there in recent weeks -- September 4 and 8, and October 16. Tensions with neighbors who see the homeless not as harmless eccentrics but as somewhere between a nuisance and a danger has been runing high at any rate. Some of the interviewees thought that might be behind the killings. But that seems implausible to the experts interviewed, who think there ismore likely a connection to the lively crack-cocaine traffic in the area.
A much lighter story inside the same paper, same day, concerned the consolations to be found in moving out of a home one owns, especially in an overpriced area, into a rental situation. The reporter, Susan Fornodd, and her husband, moved to a rental house less than a mile from one they used to own.
Still too serious a subject for you? In implication if not in tine? there's one even further inside the paper about collectors of Halloween kitsch, who are apparently excited now about Tiffany plates with pumpkin illustrations.
I did a lot of thinking during my travels about my own blogging future, and I'll bring you all into my confidence tomorrow.
As might be expected, in San Francisco over the last few days the BIG story has been the devastation in the southern part of their state, with some obvious local angles -- the bay area fire departments are sending assistance to their brethren, etc.
Less, predictably, a front page story in the San Francisco Chronicle Saturday said that there may be a serial killer preying on the homeless who camp out in Gold Gate Park. There have been three recent homicides there in recent weeks -- September 4 and 8, and October 16. Tensions with neighbors who see the homeless not as harmless eccentrics but as somewhere between a nuisance and a danger has been runing high at any rate. Some of the interviewees thought that might be behind the killings. But that seems implausible to the experts interviewed, who think there ismore likely a connection to the lively crack-cocaine traffic in the area.
A much lighter story inside the same paper, same day, concerned the consolations to be found in moving out of a home one owns, especially in an overpriced area, into a rental situation. The reporter, Susan Fornodd, and her husband, moved to a rental house less than a mile from one they used to own.
Still too serious a subject for you? In implication if not in tine? there's one even further inside the paper about collectors of Halloween kitsch, who are apparently excited now about Tiffany plates with pumpkin illustrations.
I did a lot of thinking during my travels about my own blogging future, and I'll bring you all into my confidence tomorrow.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Knowledge is warranted belief -- it is the body of belief that we build up because, while living in this world, we've developed good reasons for believing it. What we know, then, is what works -- and it is, necessarily, what has worked for us, each of us individually, as a first approximation. For my other blog, on the struggles for control in the corporate suites, see www.proxypartisans.blogspot.com.

