Showing posts with label John Kennedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Kennedy. Show all posts
28 April 2012
The Years of Lyndon Johnson: Part 4
I’m looking at a copy of Robert Caro’s latest, THE PASSAGE
OF POWER. This is the fourth book in his series THE YEARS OF LYNDON JOHNSON.
One of the themes in the early going of Vol. 4 could be
summarized in the words “Johnson dithered.” It is Caro’s view that he might
well have won the Democratic nomination for President in 1960 if he had grabbed
for it himself with his usual decisiveness and energy. But that would have
meant laying groundwork as early as 1958, and engaging in a serious hunt for
delegates through 1959. Johnson did neither of those things. Nor did he close the door on them.
He dithered.
By January 1960, he finally seemed ready to get busy. His strategy required
the Mountain West. He assumed he could go into the convention as the south’s
candidate, but to be something more, his natural allies were to be found in the
mountain states – on mining and other resource issues, he had a Senate record
that found admirers there.
So Caro gives us the following scene from early 1960. An
experienced western-states political operative, Irving Hoff, was now working
there on LBJ's behalf, and Hoff spoke for example with a key figure in Idaho who
had the wonderfully appropriate name Tom Boise.
These are Caro’s words:
In Idaho, where the
Hells Canyon Dam was rising day by day, and where political leaders knew who
had gotten them the dam at last, the Democratic state chairman, Tom Boise, had
told Hoff that, despite all the Kennedy efforts, many party leaders were still
considering supporting Johnson. ‘These guys were for Johnson,’ Hoff says, ‘If
we had been able to tell them that he was going to run, we’d have had that delegation.’
He explained this to Johnson, and Johnson accepted an invitation to speak in
Lewiston, Idaho, and afterwards to have a drink with Boise and his leaders in a
hotel suite. But in the suite [Johnson still couldn’t quite bring himself to
declare.] He said, ‘What the heck do you think I’m out here for – catching butterflies?
Do you see me carrying a net?’ But there were future government positions at
stake, careers at stake, issues at stake
– with the convention so close, rhetorical humor wasn’t enough. They pressed
him further. But all Johnson would say was, ‘I’ll let you know…You’ll be the
first to know.’”
(p. 74.)
Labels:
biography,
Idaho,
John Kennedy,
Lyndon Johnson,
mining,
Robert Caro
26 April 2007
Death of David Halberstam
Halberstam died this Monday in a car accident.
The manner of his death was perhaps the least interesting fact about his life. Halberstam will be best remembered for his coverage of America's war in Vietnam.
His reports stood out as early as 1963, when he wrote an eye-witness account of the self-immolation of Buddhist monk Thich Quang Duc. The following year,he shared the Pulitzer Prize for international reporting with Malcolm W. Browne, for their coverage of the overthrow of the Diem regime.
He entered another realm entirely when he reporting on the Washington policy-making behind the war, in his classic book The Best and the Brightest (1972). It is sad, and disabling, for reporters to become the objects of coverage themselves -- the center of the spotlight they should be directing elsewhere -- and this was the grave difficulty Halberstam faced after the appearance of B and the B.
Indeed, the self-referential character of his next bog book, The Powers that Be (1979), a study of the media elite, confirmed the problem. This book became the object of some genuine admiration for the undiminished investigative energies that poured into it but, more visible, it became the target of satire.
Still, he was Halberstam. There was only one, and that one kept working. Four new books in the 1980s and six in the 1990s. Four books in the new century, including Firehouse (2002), his take on 9/11.
But let us leave him by remembering the moments when on his own account he felt most alive, in the rice paddies, covering THE great story of his day. He wrote once to his daughter and described his feelings in the Kennedy years, after he was re-assigned from the Congo to Indochina.
"Someday I hope you will understand how important those moments were for me; more, I want you to understand the importance of remembering, of holding onto and even cherishing a part of what you have been as, more and more, events are thrust upon you. For all too often in this world, and I think with increasing force, the present seeks to obliterate the past-something I hope you will not lightly accept."
The manner of his death was perhaps the least interesting fact about his life. Halberstam will be best remembered for his coverage of America's war in Vietnam.
His reports stood out as early as 1963, when he wrote an eye-witness account of the self-immolation of Buddhist monk Thich Quang Duc. The following year,he shared the Pulitzer Prize for international reporting with Malcolm W. Browne, for their coverage of the overthrow of the Diem regime.
He entered another realm entirely when he reporting on the Washington policy-making behind the war, in his classic book The Best and the Brightest (1972). It is sad, and disabling, for reporters to become the objects of coverage themselves -- the center of the spotlight they should be directing elsewhere -- and this was the grave difficulty Halberstam faced after the appearance of B and the B.
Indeed, the self-referential character of his next bog book, The Powers that Be (1979), a study of the media elite, confirmed the problem. This book became the object of some genuine admiration for the undiminished investigative energies that poured into it but, more visible, it became the target of satire.
Still, he was Halberstam. There was only one, and that one kept working. Four new books in the 1980s and six in the 1990s. Four books in the new century, including Firehouse (2002), his take on 9/11.
But let us leave him by remembering the moments when on his own account he felt most alive, in the rice paddies, covering THE great story of his day. He wrote once to his daughter and described his feelings in the Kennedy years, after he was re-assigned from the Congo to Indochina.
"Someday I hope you will understand how important those moments were for me; more, I want you to understand the importance of remembering, of holding onto and even cherishing a part of what you have been as, more and more, events are thrust upon you. For all too often in this world, and I think with increasing force, the present seeks to obliterate the past-something I hope you will not lightly accept."
Labels:
David Halberstam,
history,
John Kennedy,
journalism,
Vietnam
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Knowledge is warranted belief -- it is the body of belief that we build up because, while living in this world, we've developed good reasons for believing it. What we know, then, is what works -- and it is, necessarily, what has worked for us, each of us individually, as a first approximation. For my other blog, on the struggles for control in the corporate suites, see www.proxypartisans.blogspot.com.


