Showing posts with label Andrew Sullivan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andrew Sullivan. Show all posts
14 August 2010
Back Away From the Label
Rand Paul, asked directly whether he is a libertarian, couldn't bring himself to say a simnple "yes."
Instead, he is a "constitutional conservative," which is different from being a "conservative" without adjective -- and different in a libertarian direction.
David Boaz, who is a libertarian without ifs, ands, or buts, and who might be expected to be ticked off at this, is understanding.
"But if you can call yourself a conservative without necessarily endorsing everything that William F. Buckley Jr. and the Heritage Foundation — or Jerry Falwell and Mike Huckabee — believe, then a politician should be able to be a moderate libertarian or a libertarian-leaning candidate."
I don't know what to think of this, but in the event some of you found it here first: try reading Andrew Sullivan's blog more often.
Instead, he is a "constitutional conservative," which is different from being a "conservative" without adjective -- and different in a libertarian direction.
David Boaz, who is a libertarian without ifs, ands, or buts, and who might be expected to be ticked off at this, is understanding.
"But if you can call yourself a conservative without necessarily endorsing everything that William F. Buckley Jr. and the Heritage Foundation — or Jerry Falwell and Mike Huckabee — believe, then a politician should be able to be a moderate libertarian or a libertarian-leaning candidate."
I don't know what to think of this, but in the event some of you found it here first: try reading Andrew Sullivan's blog more often.
Labels:
Andrew Sullivan,
libertarianism,
Rand Paul,
William F. Buckley
29 July 2010
A Little Gift for the Dr. Who Fans
A tip of the hat to Andrew Sullivan. This is fun to watch. And I was never a huge fan. But ... enjoy!
10 May 2008
Obama's victory
Obama seems finally to have sealed the deal.
Congratulations are due to him, not just on securing the nomination as it appears he has, but on dealing a blow to Clinton family influence in the nation and in its largest political party.
I have to say that I agree entirely with hawkish blogger Andrew Sullivan on one point: there's been far too much talk about how Hillary's persistence in this campaign constitutes admirable grit or determination or whatever. It constitutes nothing admirable.
"One request at least," Sullivan says, "can we retire from the dicourse the notion that there is anything even faintly admirable about the Clintons' refusal to accept that they have lost the nomination. This isn't tenacity or pluck or spunk. It's vindictive, sore-loser narcissism. And someone senior in the party needs to call it like it is."
She has been saying, in effect, that if she can't have the nomination she will at least render it valueless.
I suggest dropping out of the electoral system. That's the anarcho-capitalist way. Still, I admit that the Clinton crowd turns my stomach in a uniquely knotted manner.
Congratulations are due to him, not just on securing the nomination as it appears he has, but on dealing a blow to Clinton family influence in the nation and in its largest political party.
I have to say that I agree entirely with hawkish blogger Andrew Sullivan on one point: there's been far too much talk about how Hillary's persistence in this campaign constitutes admirable grit or determination or whatever. It constitutes nothing admirable.
"One request at least," Sullivan says, "can we retire from the dicourse the notion that there is anything even faintly admirable about the Clintons' refusal to accept that they have lost the nomination. This isn't tenacity or pluck or spunk. It's vindictive, sore-loser narcissism. And someone senior in the party needs to call it like it is."
She has been saying, in effect, that if she can't have the nomination she will at least render it valueless.
I suggest dropping out of the electoral system. That's the anarcho-capitalist way. Still, I admit that the Clinton crowd turns my stomach in a uniquely knotted manner.
12 March 2007
Those Australian Philosophers named Bruce
Okay, just a brief one today. If you have never seen the Monty Python "philosophers' song" skit, you owe yourself the treat. If you have seen it, but not recently, you'll surely want to see it again.
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/03/speaking_of_imm.html
Many thanks to Andy Sullivan for posting this, and for lifting me out of my overly somber mood.
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/03/speaking_of_imm.html
Many thanks to Andy Sullivan for posting this, and for lifting me out of my overly somber mood.
Labels:
Andrew Sullivan,
Monty Python,
music humor,
philosophy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Knowledge is warranted belief -- it is the body of belief that we build up because, while living in this world, we've developed good reasons for believing it. What we know, then, is what works -- and it is, necessarily, what has worked for us, each of us individually, as a first approximation. For my other blog, on the struggles for control in the corporate suites, see www.proxypartisans.blogspot.com.

