tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4705190583378659608.post645781940714776973..comments2023-11-13T03:52:13.643-05:00Comments on Pragmatism Refreshed: The confidentiality of a confessionChristopherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17755575167245729981noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4705190583378659608.post-45154068291772869772010-04-10T10:33:01.973-04:002010-04-10T10:33:01.973-04:00Henry,
Bentham's works are preserved as part ...Henry,<br /><br />Bentham's works are preserved as part of the Online Library of Liberty (OLL) a project of The LibertyFund. <br /><br />http://oll.libertyfund.org<br /><br />You might go there, then use the search engine on that site to enter the phrase "View of the Rationale<a href="http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php&title=1923&search=%22innocent%22&chapter=115838&layout=html#a_2361366" rel="nofollow"> of Evidence"</a>.<br /><br />The full name of the book in question, BTW, is "An Introductory View of the Rationale of Evidence, for the Use of Non-Lawyers as well as Lawyers." <br /><br />Once you get that book up on the site, scroll down to Chapter 20: "Exclusion Continued -- Causes for Which It is Proper or Not, According to Circumstances"<br /><br />(Yes, concise titles weren't an ideal for JB.) Click there to get the chapter, then scroll to section 6, "Evidence that ought to be exacted -- Client's Communications." <br /><br />Or, if I've done this right, you can save yourself some steps and just click on the words "of Evidence" above.Christopherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17755575167245729981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4705190583378659608.post-850233151145797422010-04-09T13:16:01.910-04:002010-04-09T13:16:01.910-04:00It seems to follow that Bentham would not favor th...It seems to follow that Bentham would not favor the right against self-incrimination, because to force a lawyer to testify as to what his client told him is only a step removed from forcing the client to testify against himself. Do you have a citation (preferably a link) to Bentham's views on attorney-client privilege or the right of self-incrimination?Henryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10646656656732971583noreply@blogger.com